Skip to main content
Back to BlogPersonal Injury

Negligent Security Claims in Arizona

Gil Hacohen October 7, 2026 10 min read
I'm Gil Hacohen, a Phoenix attorney and founder of Lawyers For Less. When someone is injured or facing a legal problem they did not choose, they may find themselves dealing with serious consequences, mounting expenses, lost income, and an insurance company or opposing party determined to minimize its responsibility. I believe people deserve an attorney who will take the time to understand their situation, investigate what actually happened, and challenge the other side's version of events when the evidence tells a different story. My job is to protect my clients' interests, hold responsible parties accountable, and pursue the outcome they deserve.
Gil Hacohen, Esq.|State Bar of Arizona No. 031934

Negligent security claims in Arizona arise when a property owner's failure to provide adequate security results in harm. Under Arizona premises liability law, property owners must make sure safe environments. If they neglect this duty, they may be liable for injuries caused by foreseeable crimes. Such claims can be complex, often involving detailed investigations and legal expertise to prove negligence and secure fair compensation for victims.

Key Takeaways:

  • Negligent security involves liability for harm because of inadequate security measures.
  • Victims can claim both economic and non-economic damages.
  • The statute of limitations for filing claims is two years under A.R.S. § 12-542.
  • Common liable parties include property owners and security companies.
  • Legal assistance is essential for gathering evidence and proving claims.

What is Negligent Security?

Negligent security occurs when a property fails to provide reasonable safety measures, leading to injury from crimes. This is part of premises liability, which holds property owners accountable for maintaining safe environments. Negligent security can include a range of oversights, such as failing to hire security personnel or ignoring reports of previous crime incidents on the property.

Understanding Premises Liability

Premises liability involves a legal duty for property owners to keep their locations safe. In Arizona, this includes implementing measures to prevent foreseeable crimes, aligning with the mandates under A.R.S. § 12-2505. This statute emphasizes the responsibility of property owners to anticipate potential dangers and take appropriate measures to reduce them, such as installing adequate lighting in dark areas or ensuring that security gates are functional.

Examples of Negligent Security

Common examples include lack of security cameras in parking lots, malfunctioning locks in apartment complexes, or insufficient lighting in public areas. These failures can lead to crimes like assaults or thefts, making property owners liable. Also, failure to conduct background checks on employees or to enforce strict access control can also constitute negligent security. For instance, if a hotel does not secure its entrances properly, unauthorized individuals might gain access, posing a threat to guests.

Proving a Negligent Security Claim

To succeed in a negligent security claim, you must establish that inadequate security directly led to your injury. This process involves detailed scrutiny of the circumstances surrounding the incident and often requires expert testimony to demonstrate how a lack of security measures facilitated the crime.

Elements of a Claim

A valid claim must prove:

  1. The property owner owed a duty of care.
  2. The duty was breached because of inadequate security.
  3. The breach led to foreseeable criminal activity.
  4. This activity caused your injury.

Establishing these elements often requires a complete analysis of the property’s security policies and procedures. An expert in security may be called to testify on industry standards and whether the property’s measures met these standards.

Gathering Evidence

Proving these elements requires strong evidence. Evidence collection can be extensive, involving multiple sources and types of documentation to build a convincing case.

Police Reports

Obtaining police reports helps document the incident and establish its link to security failures. These reports can provide essential timelines and details that support the claim of negligence by the property owner. They often include witness statements and initial assessments of the crime scene, which can be invaluable in court.

Security Footage

Video evidence can show lapses in security measures, such as unmonitored entrances or exits. Reviewing footage from the time leading up to the incident can reveal whether security personnel were present and attentive or if security cameras were operational. This evidence can be key in demonstrating how the absence of security measures contributed to the incident.

Compensation for Negligent Security Claims

Victims of negligent security can claim various damages based on the impact of the injury. The compensation aims to cover both the tangible and intangible losses suffered by the victims because of the incident.

Economic Damages

These include medical expenses, lost wages, and rehabilitation costs. Proper documentation is essential to measure these losses accurately. Victims should keep all receipts, bills, and records of medical treatments, and documentation from employers regarding lost income. Economic damages can also cover future medical expenses and any long-term care required because of injuries sustained in the incident.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. These are subjective and require thorough legal representation to assess. Expert testimony, such as that from a psychologist, may be necessary to support claims of emotional distress or psychological trauma resulting from the incident. The impact on daily life and personal relationships is often considered in determining the value of non-economic damages.

Statute of Limitations for Negligent Security in Arizona

The statute of limitations sets a deadline for filing lawsuits. For negligent security claims, this is two years, as stated in A.R.S. § 12-542. Missing this deadline means losing the right to sue. It is important for victims to act swiftly to make sure their rights are preserved.

Understanding A.R.S. § 12-542

A.R.S. § 12-542 requires claims to be filed within two years from the date of the incident. Exceptions may apply, such as when a victim is a minor. In cases involving minors, the statute of limitations may be tolled, meaning the clock does not start until the minor reaches the age of majority. Also, if the victim is mentally incapacitated, the statute may also be tolled.

Common Locations for Negligent Security

Negligent security incidents often occur in places where people expect safety. Understanding the common venues for such claims can help potential victims be vigilant and take preventive measures.

Apartment Complexes

Inadequate locks, poor lighting, or absent security personnel make apartment complexes frequent sites for negligent security claims. Property owners must make sure that hallways, stairwells, and parking areas are well-lit and secure, and that any security personnel are adequately trained and equipped to handle security breaches.

Parking Lots

Parking lots lacking surveillance or proper lighting can become crime hotspots, leading to potential lawsuits against property owners. The presence of security cameras, regular patrols, and clearly marked emergency contact stations can significantly reduce the risk of criminal activity. Property owners should also make sure that signage is visible and informative, guiding users on how to report suspicious activity.

Who Can Be Held Liable?

Liability in negligent security cases can extend beyond property owners. Understanding the scope of liability is important for victims seeking compensation.

Property Owners

Property owners are primarily responsible for maintaining safety. Failure to address known security issues can result in liability. They are expected to conduct regular risk assessments and implement necessary safety upgrades. If a property owner is aware of a history of criminal activity in an area but fails to improve security measures, they may be deemed negligent.

Security Companies

If a contracted security company fails in its duties, it can share liability. This may occur if they neglect monitoring or fail to respond to incidents. Security companies are expected to hire qualified personnel, provide adequate training, and make sure that security protocols are followed. A lapse in these responsibilities can make them equally liable for the resulting damages.

Steps to Take After an Incident

Taking prompt action post-incident can strengthen your claim. Immediate and strategic responses can preserve evidence and support the recovery of damages.

Immediate Actions

Secure your safety, call the police, and seek medical attention. Document the scene with photos and notes on any security lapses. It is also beneficial to collect contact information from witnesses who can corroborate your account of the incident. Promptly reporting the incident to the property manager or security personnel is also advisable, as it creates an official record of the occurrence.

Legal Consultation

Consulting a lawyer quickly is important. They can guide you through evidence collection and legal procedures. Contact us for a free consultation to explore your options. An experienced attorney can help assess the merits of your claim, estimate potential compensation, and handle the legal complexities involved in proving negligence.

Arizona Laws Impacting Negligent Security Claims

Several Arizona laws influence negligent security claims. Familiarity with these laws can help victims understand their rights and the obligations of property owners.

Key Statutes

Besides A.R.S. § 12-542, other laws such as A.R.S. § 12-2505 define property owner duties and comparative negligence standards in Arizona. Comparative negligence allows for the apportionment of fault among multiple parties, which can affect the amount of compensation a victim receives. Understanding these legal nuances is essential for building a strong case.

When to Hire a Lawyer

Hiring a lawyer early in the process is recommended. They can assist with complex legal requirements and help secure just compensation. Our experienced attorneys are ready to assist you. A lawyer can also help with negotiations, whether through settlement discussions or trial preparations, ensuring that your rights are protected throughout the legal process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered negligent security in Arizona?

Negligent security involves failing to provide adequate safety measures on a property, leading to injuries from foreseeable crimes. Arizona law requires property owners to protect visitors from such risks. This includes implementing reasonable security measures such as adequate lighting, functioning locks, and trained security personnel.

How do I prove a negligent security claim?

You need to show that inadequate security was a direct cause of the crime that injured you. Evidence like police reports and security footage is important. Expert testimony about industry standards and security protocols can also support your claim by illustrating how the property owner’s measures were insufficient.

What compensation can I receive for negligent security?

Compensation includes economic damages like medical bills and non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. The amount varies based on the case specifics, including the severity of injuries, the impact on your life, and the degree of negligence demonstrated by the property owner.

How long do I have to file a negligent security claim in Arizona?

Under A.R.S. § 12-542, you have two years from the incident date to file a claim. Missing this deadline forfeits your right to legal action. It is important to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to make sure all necessary steps are taken within the statutory timeframe.

Who can be held liable for negligent security?

Liability can fall on property owners and, in some cases, security companies. Their failure to provide adequate safety can make them responsible. The scope of liability can extend to any party responsible for maintaining security measures that were inadequately executed or neglected.

What steps should I take after a negligent security incident?

Make sure your safety, report the incident to police, and seek medical attention. Document the scene and consult a lawyer to assess your legal options. Gathering evidence promptly is important, as is obtaining witness statements and securing legal counsel to guide you through the claim process.

For a detailed discussion on your negligent security claim, contact us or visit our contact page. Our team at Lawyers For Less PLLC is here to provide affordable and complete legal assistance.

Gil Hacohen, Founder and Principal Attorney, Lawyers For Less, PLLC

Gil Hacohen, Esq.

Founder and Principal Attorney, Lawyers For Less, PLLC

State Bar of Arizona No. 031934

Licensed in Arizona since 2015

About Our Phoenix Attorney, Gil Hacohen

Gil Hacohen is the founder and principal attorney of Lawyers For Less, PLLC, a Phoenix-based law firm representing individuals and families throughout Arizona. Licensed to practice law in Arizona since 2015, Gil handles personal injury claims involving commercial trucks, delivery vehicles, and other motor vehicle collisions, including cases involving disputed liability, significant injuries, and complex insurance claims, as well as criminal defense, family law, estate planning and business formation matters. He combines hands-on legal representation with a commitment to making quality legal services accessible to everyday people.

Why I do this work

I founded Lawyers For Less in 2015 because I believed that access to quality legal representation should not depend on someone's financial resources. I wanted to build a practice where clients could receive experienced, personalized representation without feeling lost in the legal system.

That philosophy is especially important when the other side has more resources. When someone is seriously injured, charged with a crime, or going through a divorce, they may suddenly find themselves facing an insurance carrier, a prosecutor, or a legal process they don't understand. I believe my clients deserve an attorney who listens to their concerns, carefully examines the evidence, and isn't afraid to challenge the other side's conclusions.

Quick Inquiry

Get a free consultation today

Free consultation • No obligation • Confidential

Need Legal Help?

Need help with personal injury?

Learn About Our Personal Injury Services →
Free Case Evaluation

Ready to Get the Legal
Help You Deserve?

Schedule your free consultation today. No obligation, no pressure — just honest legal advice at a price you can afford.

Available Mon-Fri 8AM-6PM, Sat 9AM-1PM. Emergency consultations available.

More